Mawsool vs Apollo.io

Mawsool vs Apollo.io (2026): 1B Dated Earth Coverage vs a 240M Contact Platform

Apollo.io is the all-in-one GTM platform many SMB and mid-market teams already use for lists plus sequences. Mawsool competes on a different axis: dated Earth coverage, field fill rates, email and phone strength, and live freshness you can audit on the website.

98%+ email accuracy
GDPR · CCPA · PDPL
Money-back guarantee

Actual clients

Mawsool

Apollo.io

Contacts1B+ verified
Email accuracy98%+
Phone reliability95%+
DifferentiatorAlways Current, Always Accurate

Money-back guarantee · GDPR · CCPA · PDPL

As of 31 Oct 2026, Mawsool Earth lists 1,000,806,270 profiles (~1.00 billion) and 335,509,439 personal emails (~335.5 million). On raw coverage you can audit, Mawsool Earth lists about 1.00 billion profiles versus Apollo’s public 240M+ contact claim — more than 4× on that headline comparison, with dated country pages for the US, UK, and Gulf.

Feature comparison

Get more from Mawsool

Side-by-side criteria from the comparison brief. Mawsool advantages are marked subtly for quick scanning.

8 of 8 criteria

Feature comparison for Mawsool and Apollo.io
Feature	Mawsool	Apollo.io
Profile / contact scale	Mawsool 1,000,806,270 Earth profiles (31 Oct 2026)	Apollo.io 240M+ contacts (Apollo public product pages, 2026)
Email inventory (public)	Mawsool 335,509,439 personal emails (Earth, separate list)	Apollo.io Claims ~98% email accuracy on its data pages; contact volume not published as a separate Earth-style export
Email accuracy claim	Mawsool 98%+ product claim (triple verification)	Apollo.io Vendor accuracy messaging (see cell above)
Phone reliability claim	Mawsool 95%+ product claim (geo-prioritized)	Apollo.io Phones available; no public global phone fill-rate table comparable to Mawsool Earth
Field fill rates (public)	Mawsool Location 93%; job/seniority 87%; industry 67%; experience 61% (whole DB)	Apollo.io Not publicly published in an Earth-style table
Data freshness	Mawsool Real-time feed: Earth graph + live online signals	Apollo.io Typically batch refresh, compiler cycles, or search-time checks
MENA / GCC proof	Mawsool Dated country pages (e.g. Saudi ~9.1 million profiles; UAE ~8.7 million); about 21.8 million Gulf profiles across Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Oman	Apollo.io Global tool; no Mawsool-style public Gulf Earth export
Guarantee	Mawsool Money-back if a competitor beats volume, quality, or targeting	Apollo.io None matching Mawsool’s competitor money-back terms

Ready to level up with Mawsool?

Explore real-time lead intelligence with 1B+ verified business contacts, 98%+ email accuracy, and a money-back guarantee if a competitor offers better volume, quality, or targeting accuracy. Compare plans or book a walkthrough when you are ready.

Why teams switch

1B+ verified business contacts
98%+ email accuracy
Strong exclusive coverage in MENA with global reach
Money-back guarantee on volume, quality, or targeting accuracy

Capability focus

Mawsool vs Apollo

Approved Mawsool strengths from product context — not third-party review scores.

Email accuracy focus98%+ claimed
Phone reliability focus95%+ claimed
Real-time data emphasisLive intelligence
MENA / GCC coverage focusRegional strength

In this brief, Mawsool leads on 8 of 8 compared criteria.

Differentiator

“Always Current, Always Accurate” — real-time B2B lead intelligence with 1B+ verified business contacts.

Mawsool

AI-powered real-time B2B lead generation platform

Key figures

What Mawsool stands behind

1B+: Verified business contacts
98%+: Email accuracy
95%+: Phone reliability
MENA: Strong exclusive coverage + global reach

Money-back guarantee if a competitor offers better volume, quality, or targeting accuracy

All-in-one stack: Lead generation, enrichment, AI agent, Chrome extension, and outreach tools. Indicative pricing: Free Trial, Pay as you Go, and Enterprise — view live plan details on the pricing page

Review live pricing →

Built with compliance in mind

Full compliance support for GDPR, CCPA, and PDPL — as stated in Mawsool product context.

GDPR
CCPA
PDPL
Money-back guarantee
Triple verification

Deep dive

In-depth comparison

Coverage you can open: Mawsool Earth vs Apollo claims

Open the public proof: [/data/coverage](/data/coverage), country pages (United States ~225.4 million profiles / ~120.3 million personal emails; United Kingdom ~40.6 million / ~17.9 million), and [/data/methodology](/data/methodology). Also compare [Mawsool vs ZoomInfo](/compare/mawsool-vs-zoominfo) and [Mawsool vs Lusha](/compare/mawsool-vs-lusha).

Vendor size for Apollo.io: 240M+ contacts (Apollo public product pages, 2026). Source class: apollo.io. Treat every vendor headline as a claim until you sample your ICP. Definitions of contact, profile, and email are not identical across vendors — that is why Mawsool publishes both profile and personal-email totals with a date.

Field fill rates — Mawsool publishes them; we do not invent Apollo’s

Whole-database fill rates from Earth (31 Oct 2026):

These describe the entire Mawsool graph. They are not per-country measurements. Apollo does not publish a matching public fill-rate table on the same basis, so the comparison cell says not publicly published — not “0%.”

Email and phone: where Mawsool is materially stronger

Email scale: Earth alone lists 335.5 million personal emails. That sits beside — not inside — the profile count. Mawsool’s product claim is 98%+ email accuracy with triple verification.

Phone: Mawsool’s product claim is 95%+ phone reliability with geo-prioritized verification. Phones available; no public global phone fill-rate table comparable to Mawsool Earth.

For buyers, the practical test is simple: export the same ICP from Mawsool and Apollo, then score deliverable emails and reachable phones. Mawsool stands behind volume, quality, and targeting with a money-back guarantee.

Live freshness vs static or weekly databases

Most databases — including many workflows inside Apollo — refresh on a schedule or verify at search/export time against a stored graph. Mawsool is built as real-time lead intelligence: the Earth-scale graph is fused with live online signals so titles, companies, and contact paths stay current for fast markets (Gulf hiring cycles, US job changes, UK reshuffles).

Fresh lists raise connect rates. Stale rows burn domains. That is why freshness sits next to coverage in this comparison — not below a feature checklist.

Where Apollo is still strong (fair view)

Apollo is strong as an all-in-one GTM stack: prospecting plus native sequencing, CRM workflows, and sales engagement in one product. Many teams like that they can build a list and send sequences without leaving Apollo.

Choose Apollo when that strength is the whole job. Choose Mawsool when the job is larger auditable coverage, denser email/phone outcomes, MENA/Gulf depth, and live freshness.

MENA and Gulf depth with dated counts

Mawsool was built with serious Middle East and North Africa coverage. Earth examples (31 Oct 2026): Saudi Arabia ~9.1 million profiles / ~2.5 million personal emails; UAE ~8.7 million / ~2.7 million; plus about 21.8 million Gulf profiles across Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Oman. Broader MENA pages include Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, and Turkey.

Apollo.io remains a global product, but it does not publish this Gulf proof in the same public Earth format. For Vision 2030, family offices, regional healthcare, and GCC enterprise outbound, that gap matters.

Money-back guarantee

If Apollo (or any competitor) delivers better volume, quality, or targeting accuracy, Mawsool offers a money-back guarantee. That is the commercial expression of confidence in Earth-scale coverage and contact verification — not a slogan without terms.

Answers

Mawsool vs Apollo.io: FAQ

Is Mawsool’s database really larger than Apollo’s?

Apollo publicly markets 240M+ contacts. Mawsool Earth (31 Oct 2026) lists 1,000,806,270 profiles and 335,509,439 personal emails as separate counts. Definitions differ across vendors, but on dated profile scale Mawsool publishes a larger figure you can open on /data/coverage.

Does Mawsool replace Apollo sequencing?

Apollo is stronger as a built-in sequencing suite. Mawsool focuses on real-time discovery, verification, and coverage. Teams that need native multi-channel sequences often keep an engagement tool — or use Mawsool’s optional outreach add-on — while switching list building to Mawsool.

What Mawsool Earth numbers should I trust?

As of 31 Oct 2026, Mawsool Earth lists 1,000,806,270 profiles and 335,509,439 personal emails. Those are different lists. See /data/coverage and /data/methodology.

What are Mawsool’s email and phone product claims?

Mawsool states 98%+ email accuracy with triple verification and 95%+ phone reliability with geo-prioritized verification. These are product claims — validate on your ICP sample.

Does Mawsool invent competitor fill rates?

No. Competitor field fill rates are marked not publicly published unless the vendor shares them. We only publish Mawsool whole-database fill rates from Earth.

Is there a money-back guarantee?

Yes. If a competitor offers better volume, quality, or targeting accuracy, Mawsool offers a money-back guarantee. Start free on mawsool.tech or view pricing.

How accurate are Mawsool emails and phones vs Apollo?

Mawsool states 98%+ email accuracy with triple verification and 95%+ phone reliability with geolocation prioritization. Compare a sample list against Apollo on your ICP before deciding.

Can I switch from Apollo to Mawsool?

Yes. Rebuild your ICP in Mawsool with real-time search, advanced filters, ICP AI Hunter, or bulk enrichment from LinkedIn URLs, then export via unlimited CSV. Pilot a sample list first.

Don’t settle for Apollo

Try Mawsool for real-time verified leads, strong MENA coverage, and a money-back guarantee if a competitor offers better volume, quality, or targeting accuracy.

Or book a demo · view pricing